TeckoGecko's home theater systems, digital cameras, mp3 players, iPhone accessories, eBook readers and TVs from the end user's perspective.
Sunday, December 30, 2007
Digital audio sync problem
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
Philips HTS3544 home theater
And finally the quest is over! I have a home theater. Philips HTS3544! The manual is both for Philips HTS3544 and HTS3555. I have not idea what the difference between the models is. I connected the digital audio out from my TV. Bear in mind, that digital out is only possible for digital channels. This means that I get true Dolby sound for a good number of channels.
The sound is amazing. I never really care as much about sound, but this is the kind of thing that when you get it, it's difficult to go without it. My concern was that it would be too loud, but the sound is spread over all the channels, so when you close the door in the room not much of it escapes, while inside you have a real theatric experience. For $159 at Target, not bad at all! There is no hissing or anything unpleasant about the sound.
You can really watch all the movies you have with a totally different feeling. HTS3544 is also quite slim, it does not look like an antiquated piece of equipment. There is an iPod dock which can also be used for some Philips mp3 player I never heard of (GoGear). You can control the functions of the iPod and if you connect the dock to the television with a video cable you can watch pictures or videos on the screen. I actually was not able to achieve that, because I don't have a single picture on my iPod. Unfortunately, it does not seem to be possible to view iPod's menus on the TV screen.
There is an MP3 port and I was able to get excellent sound from it. The only complaint is that the button on the remote toggles between AUX and Digital In. Takes a few seconds to switch from one to the other.
There is one valuable option. You can indicate whether your TV is NTSC or multi-system. I have a bunch of PAL DVDs. My old DVD recorder (also a Philips) could play them, but the TV was unable to display them properly. A TVs problem, primarily, but very inconvenient.
I ordered a Belkin HDMI cable from Buy.com for $10. When I get it I will be able to test upconversion. I cannot emphasize it enough that you do not have to pay $40-$60 for a cable at your local BestBuy or what have you. This is just a total scam. For a short cable you don't even have to have a real brand. I got a 6 inch Belkin, so this should be just fine.
One thing I have to try is playback of DivX disks.
So far, I was unable to make my Philips universal remote to work with this home theater... I was hoping that Philips products would work together...
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
DAVHDX265 - no digital audio in either.
Really, is it that unreasonable to expect a digital audio port in a home theater system? I could have gotten a Philips HTS3151D for $90 as an open box. I really like these Philips home theaters. But this digital in issue keeps coming up. I do not want to get something that will intimately not do the job for me.
Saturday, December 15, 2007
Insignia NS-H2002 home theater
This home theater does not have a digital in, so I am not interested in it per se. But it is crazy cheap at $69. It might not be as powerful, but the my interest in it is entirely of a different sort. Suppose, one even knew that this system is prone to breaking and developing all sorts of problems. Still, wouldn't this be the case when getting an extended warranty actually be a good idea? With a product so cheap, well bellow competition, you could have it replaced if it ever broke... Insignia is a BestBuy brand, so it is probably not all that terrible after all.
DAVHDZ235 vs. Philips HTS3555
To my great dissatisfaction, it turned out that Sony Bravia DAVHDZ235 does not have a digital in. I don't know why I assumed that it would. It seems as if Philips is more digitally diligent. Their HTS3555/37 has a DTS and Dolby Digital Decoder. And the speakers are not as huge as on some other models, and the main unit is somewhat slim.
It also has a MP3 line-in and a USB port. It does upconversion to 1080i and even plays DiVx files.
BestBuy has it for $180 or something, but from the reviews (quite good, I must add) it looks like it sold for $156 at some other point.
Here is the manual to this Philips HTS3555 home theater:
Monday, December 10, 2007
DAV-HDZ235 upconversion
Saturday, December 8, 2007
Nintendo DS Lite coupons - one sweet deal
Sony Bravia DAVHDZ235 home theater and Sharp SH12U
Thursday, November 29, 2007
KLH SBHT 6W 6-Piece 550-Watt Micro Home Theater
KLH SBHT 6W 6-Piece 550-Watt Micro Home Theater
1 subwoofer, 2 front-channel speakers, 2 rear-channel speakers, 1 center-channel speaker, and speaker wire. This product should be available under $200!
Really cool design. It would be great to be able to turn the speakers in any direction.
I actually have a KLH TV/DVD combo and it has served me well.
Sansa e280 microSD issue
Thursday, November 22, 2007
Sansa e280 and High Capacity SD cards
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
Sansa e280, Sansa and Rhapsody, Sansa and SD
Apparently, Costco has a pretty sweet deal on Sansa e280... I really like this line even though I had a few problems with e200. Rhapsody, shipped with Sansa devices, is not the most reliable piece of software out there. I eventually switched to MusicMatch, recently rebranded by Yahoo. Even this one refused to deal with legitimately purchased songs. I still prefer having CDs and ripping them. Another annoyance is in the way Sansa works with SD cards. I don't know yet if this got fixed in e280, but the one I have takes forever to start each time under the pretext of refreshing the database - it has to read all the data on the SD card before proceeding. It is somewhat understandable, but annoying nonetheless. With 8 gb or memory using an SD card will not be such a necessity, I hope... Regardless, these Sansa devices leave the competition (read: Nano) in the dust.
Sunday, November 18, 2007
Largest LCD TV in existence (from Sharp)?
I found some news articles from 2004 about Sharp developing a 65-inch Aquos - the largest LCD to date. Sure enough, three years later the model is available for purchase - LC-65D64U. Apparently, that's how long it takes. The price tag on this LCD monster is about $8,000. The largest model that Sharp has built seems to be a 108-incher. I have not idea how much it might cost.
Features | |
Full HD 1080p (1920 x 1080) Resolution | |
for the sharpest picture possible. | |
10,000:1 Dynamic Contrast Ratio and 4ms1 Response Time | |
produces spectacular picture quality. | |
Three HDMI™ (version 1.3) and Dual Component Inputs | |
for the ultimate in terminal flexibility. All HD inputs are compatible with 1080p sources and compatible with X.V. color for extended color gamut. | |
Wide Viewing Angles (176º H x 176º V) | |
Sharp's AQUOS LCD TV viewing angles are so wide, you can view the TV clearly from practically anywhere in the room. | |
Enhanced Black Level | |
provides the deepest, most accurate blacks of any flat panel TV. | |
High Brightness (450 cd/m2) | |
AQUOS LCD Televisions are very bright. You can put them virtually anywhere – even near windows, doors or other light sources – and the picture is still vivid. | |
Built-in ATSC/QAM/NTSC Tuners | |
provide access to DTV and analog TV channels. | |
AQUOS engine with ASV Technology | |
provides high-performance video processing for the brightest, most vivid colors and images. |
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Good tip for Aquos buyers
It is believed that the Costco lcc3242u - 32" Aquos LCD TV, is the same model as Sharp lc32d43u. It is extremely difficult to find reviews of the Costo model, while a search for lc32d43u returns thousands of pages. Of course, this way you can also find a better price. But I would not recommend that, because Costco's warranty cannot be beaten!
MediaSmart LCDs note
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
WiFi in a television set? HP SL4778N , HP SL4778N
HP SL4278N 42-inch MediaSmart High-Definition 1080p LCD TV
HP SL4778N 47-inch MediaSmart High-Definition 1080p LCD TV
This LCD TV has 3 HDMI inputs, but only one Antenna/Cable in. This deeply bothers me, because it means that TV manufacturers not exactly interested in providing us with viewing options. I would much prefer using cable for analog, and antenna for digital channels. Or combine them, if possible. This may end up developing into an even more troubling tendency not to include ATSC tuners, only QAM (if that's in fact a legal possibility, given the current regulations).
But here is the cool part!
These HP LCDs have built-in WiFi. This means you can access files on your home network on on the Internet (the remote control makes it quite easy). What kind of files are we talking about?
Graphics:
Jpg, png, tif, gif
Music:
m4b, mp3, wma, wav, ogg
Audio/Video:
avi, divx, xvid, dvr-ms, mp4, mpg, wmv/asf
There is also some limited support for DRM. Basically, this sounds a lot like AppleTV, as long as you already have a computer :)
Saturday, November 10, 2007
Quest for a home theater
As I wrote previously about my Sharp SH12U, the volume level is just not sufficient, and I expect that on a hot summer day the air-conditioner will likely make it very difficult for me to hear anything coming out of the television. This is especially true for QAM cable channels. Analog ones are a little louder.
A simple solution to this problem would be a home theater. Simple, but not inexpensive! And I am just not the kind of guy who needs authentic reproduction of audio in scenes "where stuff blows up." I just need something with a little more power than what my Sharp has to offer. I realize that this creates some incompatible expectations on my part. Nevertheless I will list the points that are important for me:
- under $150
- small form factor/footprint
- wireless speakers. Yes, I don't like wires. Can you blame me?
- if there is a DVD player it better be capable of upconverting to 1080i
I am still looking for this perfect combination, but because I will probably not find it, my top contender at this point is:
RCA RTD215
Official specs:
ENERGY STAR® qualified – This model consumes less than one watt in standby mode and meets the standards of the ENERGY STAR Program for energy efficiency
DVD/CD Home Theatre System – A complete package to experience DVD movies in surround sound
200 Watts Total System Power – 32 Watts x 5 with a 40 Watt Subwoofer
USB Input – Connect most mp3 players, thumbdrives and digital cameras through the front USB jack and enjoy your music or photos through the home theatre system
Multi-Format Playback – Plays DVD, DVD+R/RW, DVD-R/RW, CD, CD-R/RW, mp3, WMA®, VCD, SVCD and JPEG
Digital AM/FM Tuner – Tunes AM/FM stations with maximum accuracy and minimum drift
Dolby Digital® – Up to 5.1 channels with full, wide band frequency response. Five main channels are discrete & have 20Hz-20kHz frequency response
Display Type – VFD
What's missing?
I checked the manual to get some additional info.
- No HDMI, only component. Well, that's not so bad, I guess.
- No upconversion. But at least there is a progressive scan mode.
- No wireless. I'm afraid this is the feature I want the most, but it is also more expensive.
What's not necessary, but present?
The USB connection. Well, maybe that's useful, but believe it or not you can actually rip music of CDs to save it on USB devices. In my opinion this is entirely unnecessary. I'd rather see upconversion to 1080i. No such luck.
The good news is, however, that RCA apparently makes decent home theaters. Maybe one day they will have the right one for me?
Friday, November 9, 2007
Panasonic's portable GPS
Panasonic's Strada CN-GP5OU is the newest portable GPS available. 5" Widescreen LCD Monitor, GPS Assist, Bluetooth Hands-Free Calling... You can get a GPS for a lot less these days. The big plus (no pun intended) on this one is a bigger LCD screen. There is also an SD card slot. You can apparently use this device as an extremely overpriced picture frame, since it can be easily taken off the mount.
A GPS is precisely the thing that I always wanted, but it is also something I have no use for whatsoever! Regardless, it is impossible to buy one anywhere as of now. I think I will probably buy a GPS when they are below $50. Just to play with for a couple of days :)
Thursday, November 8, 2007
Sharp Aquos vs. SH12U
The irony of watching commercials about television sets ON a television set never escaped me. When I see commercials about Sharp Aquos (D62U series), those TVs sure look awesome. They look awesome ON my Sharp SH12U! The quality of the picture of SH12U is so great that I honestly cannot see too many improvements when I compare the too in person. In theory, I know that Aquos should have an improved black level. In my opinion, however, Sharp already achieved pretty good levels of black on their previous models. It's just something they worked on, apparently. LCDs have a bad reputation for not having very good black levels. Supposedly they are not very good for watching movies in a dark room. This was a bit of a problem with my old ProView LCD, but SH12U simply makes it a no issue. So, I am still pretty happy with it, even though it is possible that Aquos is approaching "the look and feel" of a plasma screen TV.
Friday, October 19, 2007
Sharp SH12U
This LCD TV has a QAM, as well as a terrestrial HD tuner. This is nice, because if you have standard cable chances are that you can get all the free HDTV channels available off the air in your area.
- Screen Size: 26"
- Aspect Ratio: 16:9
- Resolution: 1366 x 768
- Contrast Ratio: 1200:1
- Brightness: 450 cd/m2
- Response Time: 6ms
- Lamp Life: 2 60,000 hrs.
- Viewing Angles: 176°H x 176°V
- Tuning: NTSC/ATSC/QAM
- Stand: included
- Limited Warranty: 1 year parts, 90 days labor
- Dimensions (w x h x d) (in inches): 26-5/16 x 17-3/4 x 4-9/16 (TV only) 26-5/16 x 19-11/16 x 9-9/16 (TV and Stand)
- Weight (lbs): 25.4 (TV only), 28.4 (TV and Stand)
Thursday, October 18, 2007
New distance
There is no debate whether cell phones make us more connected in a technological sense of the word. However, interpersonal connections are affected by cell phones in strange and interesting ways. Yes, it is certainly priceless to be able to get a hold of our friends and family any time, anywhere (as long as they keep their phones on and charged, darn it). But let's look at the limitations of 'cellular society', and then perhaps try to detect some signs of danger.
A typical mobile phone user knows well at what times the calls are free, where one should expect roaming charges, and with whom he or she can talk for a long time without paying a cent (i.e. people on the same network). Oddly enough, we may be able to communicate more easily with someone in a different state, as opposed to family members in the same town. We can become locked in within a certain group of people simply because we chose a specific service provider. It is no big deal for most of us, but for those who tend to talk a lot cell phones can help build relationships following a rather unnatural framework. Cellular networks are the new distance.
Text messaging, in my opinion, is a different story altogether. It is a cheaper, more democratic technology. But some troubling trends that can develop here. 'Texting' results in downgrading the level of personal connectedness between people. You cannot 'text' your true state of mind, your disposition towards the addressee. The possibilities for misinterpretation are also enormous. One can spend hours waiting for a reply, while being fully aware that no other mode of communication is possible for any number of reasons. The obvious objection can be that this is no different from email. The difference, however, is in the fact that computers occupy only specific locations in the spatial make-up of our individual lives. We can step away from them. Text messaging devices become attached to us and this causes them to have a greater affect upon us. We are more likely to put on a mask, to create a separate persona while texting than at any other time.
Cell phones are ushering in a new world of interpersonal relations, but this world is not going to be intrinsically more cohesive and transparent. There will also be new opportunities for compartmentalizing of individuals and wide-spread dystopia in the society.
Cell phones in restaurants?
People should be discouraged from using cell-phones in restaurants that find it inappropriate to have their patrons needlessly disturbed. I am far from suggesting a complete ban. Rather it seems as if establishments should make their own choices. I know a couple of restaurants where the atmosphere is such that one could care less (and it is so noisy there that you could not use a phone anyway). In fact, it would not be such a bad idea to have cell-phone licenses issued to restaurants. This would indicate that noise pollution and additional high-tech nuisances often associated with mobile phones are generally not welcome in certain public areas.
There is also another, more important issue. By making a choice about the use of cell-phones in locations typically understood as safe havens of human existence, we are preparing ourselves for other decisions that will be dealing with technologies that have not yet fully evolved. If mobile phones are primarily 'hated' as agents of sonic and social distraction, imagine how much worse things will become when popular personal devices allow one to project a 40-inch holographic videophone screen from a pen-size device.
Our ancestors in their wisdom decided that when gentlemen go inside, their horses must stay outside. By getting it right with cell phones we save ourselves some trouble in the future.
Official TV
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
new TV or a vacation?
Here is another way to look at it. A good LCD TV will last many years. A good vacation will last forever...